- the deCordova sculpture park and museum in Lincoln, MA
- "Nari Ward: LIVESupport" installed at Lehmann Maupin in New York
- "2010 Whitney Biennial" at the Whitney Museum in New York
- the Neuberger Museum at SUNY Purchase
- MASS MoCA in North Adams, MA
- and a whole mess of galleries that opened in Chelsea this past Thursday in New York
Monday, March 15, 2010
Spring Break 2010
Tuesday, February 16, 2010
THIS LOVE
Soundtrack: 'Moments in Love' by Art of Noise.
Friday, January 29, 2010
Link to My Article in The Daily Free Press
Monday, January 25, 2010
Alonzo King Lines Ballet at the ICA Boston
Although the theatre was packed, and the show sold out, our Friday night excursion to the ICA for the Alonzo King Lines Ballet was an energizing and evocative experience. The strikingly unique and surreal performance was the perfect remedy for the monotony of college parties. The welcoming spirit from the much older attendees was refreshing, who seemed impressed that we’d made the effort to try something different. We felt proud to take our seats among the seasoned crowd.
We were immediately mesmerized when the glowing figures took over the empty stage and moved their chiseled, statuesque bodies with incredible vigor. The focus was just movement and light. In a variety of groups, the ten dancers in the company thrust into unexpected poses, even climbing over one another and rolling on the floor.
As their muscles twist and distorted in the dramatic lighting, the dancers transcended traditional notions of grace and beauty. The cast exhibited a sense of total commitment to their craft, fused through their linked arms and flowing out into the audience. It seemed as though Henri Matisse’s painting The Dance had come to life when the dancers pulled and dragged each other across the stage.
In the first act, the heavy African drum beats and shamanistic chanting that accompanied the precise choreography created a chaotic, ritualistic mood. The following act contained similar gestures and moves, however the audio, reminiscent of gothic hymns, serenely transformed the performance. This spiritual presence unified the performance and ignited conversation about the nature of religious ceremonies.
Occasionally, the music would stop short and the dancers’ heavy breath was the only sound that filled the auditorium. This effect reminded viewers that despite the supernatural appearance of the dancers, they are still human.
The intense concentration of the audience was only interrupted once, when two male dancers walked on stage in shimmering silver tutus, eliciting laughter from several audience members. Gender stereotypes were challenged further when two male dancers were paired in a sensuous routine.
Although the location of the ballet—a contemporary art museum was initially surprising, after the performance it became clear that the experimental institution was a more appropriate venue than the Boston Opera House. This contemporary dance company from San Francisco challenged our preconceived ideas about ballet, the limitations of the human body, and definitely made us more aware of the many different, worthwhile ways to spend a Friday night in Boston.
After witnessing the human body be pushed to it physical boundaries, it felt a little pathetic that the only way to show appreciation for the performance was by slapping two hands together.
(Credits: Written with my companion to the ballet, Amanda James)
Thursday, January 21, 2010
II Mondo Della Luna

Despite the ambiguous New York Times review about the performance, I would love to see "II Mondo Della Luna" at the Hayden Planetarium just for the visuals. It looks a lot more stimulating than IMax Avatar.
Wednesday, January 13, 2010
Review: Nine
.jpg)
Well, I think the world would have been a better place had they left it at 8 1/2. When Nine finally came to a close, my mom's boyfriend turned to our party and exclaimed "thank god that's over". The entire section laughed with us. In the lobby, we decided Daniel Day-Lewis should be arrested for cultural terrorism.
Tuesday, December 29, 2009
Airport Art
Saturday, December 26, 2009
Review: ICA Boston's Permanent Collection On Display
The past thirty years of art history have been symptomatic of crisis of cultural authority. In the modern period, works of art claimed to represent some authentic vision of the world based on universal truths. Postmodern work attempts to undermine the reassuring stability of modernism’s master narratives. The breakdown of binaries has allowed for the emergence of a more encompassing art world, with the presence of voices and materials previously denied by modernism. Artwork being produced now comes directly out of postmodernism, and in many cases works that are distinctly postmodern are placed under the banner of contemporary. The problem with this combination is that it extends the term contemporary to art of the past thirty years. The ICA Boston faces a similar problem by thematically placing work from the 1970s along side work produced several years ago. In our fast-paced society, cultural institutions are unable to stay up to date with the mass amount of works being produced, consequently many contemporary collections rely on artists and mediums that have already been canonized instead of taking genuine risks.
This fall on display at the Institute of Contemporary Art in Boston is the fourth exhibition of the permanent collection, entitled In the Making, which offers “an in-depth look at how artistic approaches to medium transform familiar subjects into resonant images and experiences” (ICA Website). Each gallery in the exhibition focuses on a single medium, either photography, painting, sculpture, or video. However, the only practice that is well represented in the show is photography, which accounts for seven of the twelve artists whose work is displayed. Even so, there is a strong female presence in the exhibit, which features the contemporary art veterans Nan Goldin, Cindy Sherman and Marlene Dumas, as well as recent recruits to the museum circuit Tara Donovan, Rineke Dijkstra and Cornelia Parker.
Sherman and Dumas are members of the recently termed Pictures Generation, whom found their subjects from photographs culled from newspapers and magazines. Their work is symptomatic of postmodernism because both seek to undermine traditional, master narratives by ambiguously displaying the female body in a variety of imagined environments. Sherman and Dumas’ works are essential to understanding the immediate history of contemporary art, however, the work itself can no longer be described as contemporary. Since the 1970s, Cindy Sherman and Marlene Dumas have had very successful and noteworthy careers and are no longer really cutting edge. Their work has been canonized and is represented in many public and private collections. They have their own market and are safe investments for an institutions such as the ICA. Furthermore, their highly refined critiques of the social constructions of gender and sexuality, feel very characteristic of 1980s postmodern art. It is hard to divorce these objects from their cultural context and connect them to the present. As well, they do not speak to the technology driven contemporary era.
While Cindy Sherman and Marlene Dumas’ work feels static in the collection of the Institute of Contemporary Art Boston, Tara Donovan’s sculptures are more representative of contemporaneity. However, these works are connected by their denial of traditional narratives and modernist myths. Sherman, Dumas and Donovan similarly use alternative means, such as household objects and subjects from popular culture, to confront the viewer. In order to understand the progression of contemporary art and the relevance of Tara Donovan, it is necessary to be familiar with the work of Cindy Sherman and Marlene Dumas.
Overall, the ICA's permanent collection provides a good introduction to the changes that have occurred in the art world over the past thirty years, as a result of postmodernism, and its effect on younger artists. However, the collection has failed (like many other institutions, particularly the MoMA) to address the current condition of art (globalism, "festival culture", multiculturalism). Ultimately, the collection is trapped by its limited, Western conceptions of art that view the contemporary as a continue of modernism.
Thursday, December 24, 2009
BEARDEER
Wednesday, December 23, 2009
Holiday Season Survival

Tuesday, November 10, 2009
The Wild One: Pauline Kael...?
Bellow I have posted my introduction and conclusion (so FAR) for a paper on (my problems with) the New Yorker film critic Pauline Kael for my class on arts criticism with Professor Marx:
“The hot-pants Queen Victoria of American film criticism”, Pauline Kael is considered by many to have been rebellious for adamantly attacking mainstream values and championing alternative sensibilities in her reviews of popular cinema. Her racy and occasionally vulgar prose was shocking for many readers, which made Kael’s criticism seem defiant, even though the ideas she set forth in her reviews of movies were not radical for the time. Despite the perception of Kael as a rebel, she did not actually champion the subversive filmmakers of underground and art house cinema. Kael dismissed truly revolutionary and experimental films in favor of New Hollywood movies, which challenged the way that major studios produced movies. Kael only references the work of avant-garde filmmakers, such as Kenneth Anger and Andy Warhol to strengthen her reviews of New Hollywood movies. Ultimately, Kael remains a conventional film critic because she overlooks or entirely ignores filmmakers that operate outside of the Hollywood sphere. In addition, Kael dismisses art house films because they threaten her argument that intellectualism kills the visceral pleasure of movies.
Kael disregards experimental films that are actually subversive to champion studio films that make small subversive gestures. Kael never clearly defines her idea of a “subversive gesture” and Alan Vanneman asserts, “Kael sounds like she's back in high school, where "freedom" is making some smart remark the teacher doesn't hear” (Vanneman). Kael claims that movies are successful when they make the audience feel alive, yet she overlooks avant-garde films that provoke an intense audience response. In her famous review of Last Tango in Paris, Kael’s compares the first screening of Bernardo Bertolucci’s film to the first performance of Igor Stravinsky’s ballet, The Rite of Spring, at which the audience degenerated into a riot that required police intervention. Kael argues that the erotic film is a breakthrough movie and “Bertolucci and Brando have altered the face of an art form” because the movie elicits an intense response from the audience (Kael). Kael’s enthusiasm for Last Tango in Paris is elucidated in the following passage:
The closing night of the New York Film Festival, October 14, 1972: that date should become a landmark in movie history comparable to May 29, 1913—the night Le Sacre du Printemps was first performed—in music history. There was no riot, and no one threw anything at the screen, but I think it’s fair to say that the audience was in a state of shock, because Last Tango in Paris has the same kind of hypnotic excitement as the Sacre, the same primitive force, and the same thrusting, jabbing eroticism (Kael 450).
Even though, the screening of Last Tango in Paris did not elicit a violent or aggressive response from any audience member, Kael still considers this a historic moment in movie history. However, Kael never mentions the screening of a film by Luis Bunuel that provoked the audience to totally trash the theatre and slash the film screen itself ( Joan Hawkins 60). Furthermore, Kael completely ignores more experimental filmmakers that provoke overwhelming audience responses, such as Jack Smith, whose movie Flaming Creatures was seized by police at its premiere and officially determined to be obscene by a New York Criminal court for its surreal, graphic depiction of sexuality.
In the end, Pauline Kael wants coherent movies, filled with wit and feeling that make little jabs at the establishment, not radical films that question the entire structure of society. Kael identifies herself with “the plain folks” who go to the movies for trashy entertainment. Watching Jack Smith’s Flaming Creatures while smoking marijuana at the Charles Theatre in New York is too intellectual and primitive for Kael.
Works Cited:
- Kael, Pauline. For Keeps: 30 Years at the Movies. Plume (September 1, 1996)
- Hawkins, Joan. Cutting edge: art-horror and the horrific avant-garde. Univ Of Minnesota Press; 1 edition (May 8, 2000)
Jack Smith and the Destruction of Atlantis
Jack Smith is my idol. I want to wholly consume everything he ever made. I need the documentary about him entitled "Jack Smith and the Destruction of Atlantis". It is not even on netflix, goddamn.

