Tuesday, December 29, 2009
Airport Art
Saturday, December 26, 2009
Review: ICA Boston's Permanent Collection On Display
The past thirty years of art history have been symptomatic of crisis of cultural authority. In the modern period, works of art claimed to represent some authentic vision of the world based on universal truths. Postmodern work attempts to undermine the reassuring stability of modernism’s master narratives. The breakdown of binaries has allowed for the emergence of a more encompassing art world, with the presence of voices and materials previously denied by modernism. Artwork being produced now comes directly out of postmodernism, and in many cases works that are distinctly postmodern are placed under the banner of contemporary. The problem with this combination is that it extends the term contemporary to art of the past thirty years. The ICA Boston faces a similar problem by thematically placing work from the 1970s along side work produced several years ago. In our fast-paced society, cultural institutions are unable to stay up to date with the mass amount of works being produced, consequently many contemporary collections rely on artists and mediums that have already been canonized instead of taking genuine risks. 
         This fall on display at the Institute of Contemporary Art in Boston is the fourth exhibition of the permanent collection, entitled In the Making, which offers “an in-depth look at how artistic approaches to medium transform familiar subjects into resonant images and experiences” (ICA Website). Each gallery in the exhibition focuses on a single medium, either photography, painting, sculpture, or video. However, the only practice that is well represented in the show is photography, which accounts for seven of the twelve artists whose work is displayed. Even so, there is a strong female presence in the exhibit, which features the contemporary art veterans Nan Goldin, Cindy Sherman and Marlene Dumas, as well as recent recruits to the museum circuit Tara Donovan, Rineke Dijkstra and Cornelia Parker.
Sherman and Dumas are members of the recently termed Pictures Generation, whom found their subjects from photographs culled from newspapers and magazines. Their work is symptomatic of postmodernism because both seek to undermine traditional, master narratives by ambiguously displaying the female body in a variety of imagined environments. Sherman and Dumas’ works are essential to understanding the immediate history of contemporary art, however, the work itself can no longer be described as contemporary. Since the 1970s, Cindy Sherman and Marlene Dumas have had very successful and noteworthy careers and are no longer really cutting edge. Their work has been canonized and is represented in many public and private collections. They have their own market and are safe investments for an institutions such as the ICA. Furthermore, their highly refined critiques of the social constructions of gender and sexuality, feel very characteristic of 1980s postmodern art. It is hard to divorce these objects from their cultural context and connect them to the present. As well, they do not speak to the technology driven contemporary era.
While Cindy Sherman and Marlene Dumas’ work feels static in the collection of the Institute of Contemporary Art Boston, Tara Donovan’s sculptures are more representative of contemporaneity. However, these works are connected by their denial of traditional narratives and modernist myths. Sherman, Dumas and Donovan similarly use alternative means, such as household objects and subjects from popular culture, to confront the viewer. In order to understand the progression of contemporary art and the relevance of Tara Donovan, it is necessary to be familiar with the work of Cindy Sherman and Marlene Dumas.
Overall, the ICA's permanent collection provides a good introduction to the changes that have occurred in the art world over the past thirty years, as a result of postmodernism, and its effect on younger artists. However, the collection has failed (like many other institutions, particularly the MoMA) to address the current condition of art (globalism, "festival culture", multiculturalism). Ultimately, the collection is trapped by its limited, Western conceptions of art that view the contemporary as a continue of modernism.
Thursday, December 24, 2009
BEARDEER
Wednesday, December 23, 2009
Holiday Season Survival


Tuesday, November 10, 2009
The Wild One: Pauline Kael...?
Bellow I have posted my introduction and conclusion (so FAR) for a paper on (my problems with) the New Yorker film critic Pauline Kael for my class on arts criticism with Professor Marx:
           “The hot-pants Queen Victoria of American film criticism”, Pauline Kael is considered by many to have been rebellious for adamantly attacking mainstream values and championing alternative sensibilities in her reviews of popular cinema. Her racy and occasionally vulgar prose was shocking for many readers, which made Kael’s criticism seem defiant, even though the ideas she set forth in her reviews of movies were not radical for the time. Despite the perception of Kael as a rebel, she did not actually champion the subversive filmmakers of underground and art house cinema. Kael dismissed truly revolutionary and experimental films in favor of New Hollywood movies, which challenged the way that major studios produced movies. Kael only references the work of avant-garde filmmakers, such as Kenneth Anger and Andy Warhol to strengthen her reviews of New Hollywood movies. Ultimately, Kael remains a conventional film critic because she overlooks or entirely ignores filmmakers that operate outside of the Hollywood sphere. In addition, Kael dismisses art house films because they threaten her argument that intellectualism kills the visceral pleasure of movies.
            Kael disregards experimental films that are actually subversive to champion studio films that make small subversive gestures. Kael never clearly defines her idea of a “subversive gesture” and Alan Vanneman asserts, “Kael sounds like she's back in high school, where "freedom" is making some smart remark the teacher doesn't hear” (Vanneman). Kael claims that movies are successful when they make the audience feel alive, yet she overlooks avant-garde films that provoke an intense audience response. In her famous review of Last Tango in Paris, Kael’s compares the first screening of Bernardo Bertolucci’s film to the first performance of Igor Stravinsky’s ballet, The Rite of Spring, at which the audience degenerated into a riot that required police intervention. Kael argues that the erotic film is a breakthrough movie and “Bertolucci and Brando have altered the face of an art form” because the movie elicits an intense response from the audience (Kael). Kael’s enthusiasm for Last Tango in Paris is elucidated in the following passage: 
The closing night of the New York Film Festival, October 14, 1972: that date should become a landmark in movie history comparable to May 29, 1913—the night Le Sacre du Printemps was first performed—in music history. There was no riot, and no one threw anything at the screen, but I think it’s fair to say that the audience was in a state of shock, because Last Tango in Paris has the same kind of hypnotic excitement as the Sacre, the same primitive force, and the same thrusting, jabbing eroticism (Kael 450).
Even though, the screening of Last Tango in Paris did not elicit a violent or aggressive response from any audience member, Kael still considers this a historic moment in movie history. However, Kael never mentions the screening of a film by Luis Bunuel that provoked the audience to totally trash the theatre and slash the film screen itself ( Joan Hawkins 60). Furthermore, Kael completely ignores more experimental filmmakers that provoke overwhelming audience responses, such as Jack Smith, whose movie Flaming Creatures was seized by police at its premiere and officially determined to be obscene by a New York Criminal court for its surreal, graphic depiction of sexuality. 
            In the end,  Pauline Kael wants coherent movies, filled with wit and feeling that make little jabs at the establishment, not radical films that question the entire structure of society. Kael identifies herself with “the plain folks” who go to the movies for trashy entertainment. Watching Jack Smith’s Flaming Creatures while smoking marijuana at the Charles Theatre in New York is too intellectual and primitive for Kael. 
Works Cited:
- Kael, Pauline. For Keeps: 30 Years at the Movies. Plume (September 1, 1996)
 - Hawkins, Joan. Cutting edge: art-horror and the horrific avant-garde. Univ Of Minnesota Press; 1 edition (May 8, 2000)
 
       
Jack Smith and the Destruction of Atlantis
Jack Smith is my idol. I want to wholly consume everything he ever made. I need the documentary about him entitled "Jack Smith and the Destruction of Atlantis". It is not even on netflix, goddamn.
Thursday, November 5, 2009
Fred Wilson: Installations of the Hidden
Thursday, October 29, 2009
Greatest British Painter of the 20th Century: Francis Bacon at the MET
The Cultural Arbitrators of YOUTUBE
Monday, September 7, 2009
ATTENTION
The following video(s) from your account have been disabled for violation of the YouTube Community Guidelines:
AN EROTIC TALE - (prestoenamel)
Most nudity is not allowed on YouTube, particularly if it is in a sexual context. Videos that are intended to be sexually provocative are also generally not acceptable for YouTube. There are exceptions for some educational, documentary and scientific content, but only if that is the sole purpose of the video and it is not sexually gratuitous.
Your account has received one Community Guidelines warning strike, which will expire in six months. Additional violations may result in the temporary disabling of your ability to post content to YouTube and/or the termination of your account.
Date Received: September 03, 2009
.... and i found all of the clips on youtube
Sunday, August 16, 2009
Wednesday, July 15, 2009
Thursday, March 26, 2009
Friday, March 20, 2009
Yo BK You On Kings

Well I guess I have figured out how the Brooklyn Museum is making a little extra cash money during the hard-times, by offering its renovated entrance to network television. It sounds sort of like the Bk museum is selling out, but hardly, the facade of the building located on Eastern Parkway is featured in the new prime-time drama "Kings". The show imagines the city of New York as the capital of a North Atlantic monarch, and the entrance of the Brooklyn Museum is meant to be the king's city palace, which is actually supposed to be situated where the Time Warner building is in Columbus Circle, according to the view from inside the castle, and yes I do have quite a bit of free time and pay attention when shows are filmed on location, support New York.
Tuesday, February 24, 2009
Blair's Nflick Queue
Heres the trailer for the Pedro Almodovar dvd which arrived from my netflicks queue. its a keeper alright.
I'm Coconutty for Milk

Thursday, February 12, 2009
Allston Brighton Art Expo -- Be There You Square!
South End Surmise
Wednesday, February 11, 2009
Talking Bout My Girl
Tracey Emin on the loose! This video is kinda old, but I just can't seem to get enough of it. I want to be free like her and make self expressive art with my vomit




